Skip to main content

Part 6.2: Inbreeding

Module 6: Evolutionary Mechanisms II - Mutation, Genetic Drift, Migration, and Non-Random Mating

What is inbreeding?

The mating of organisms or individuals that are closely related through common ancestry is inbreeding. Homozygosity is increased when inbreeding which means the frequency of AA will increase which will eventually become fixed for the A gene. The greater the degree of homozygosity the more uniform the offspring will be. [3] 

What are the benefits of inbreeding that may lead to the evolution of assortative mating?

Advantages of inbreeding include increased uniformity and prepotency (ability to pass on traits to offspring), and desired traits and breeding types can be fixed. Homozygosity is increased when inbreeding which means the frequency of AA will increase which will eventually become fixed for the A gene. The greater the degree of homozygosity the more uniform the offspring will be. [3] This may have lead to assortative mating in which pair bonds are formed on the basis of phenotypes when individuals organisms choose to mate those similar to themselves. [2]

What are some of the costs of inbreeding that may have prompted the evolution of inbreeding avoidance (disassortative mating)?

The disadvantages of inbreeding include lower fertility, lower "vigor", birth defects, smaller size, fewer offspring, slower growth, higher offspring, slower growth, higher offspring mortality, shorter lifespan, increase in genetic diseases,  and reduced "genetic potential" (ability to improve a trait). Inbreeding reduces fitness leading to inbreeding depression. The decrement in fitness is proportional to the degree of inbreeding. [3]


Figure 1: Cost of inbreeding [3]

The cost of inbreeding may have led to disassortative mating where opposites attract and individuals rather mate with individuals who are phenotypically different. 

Resources

[1] https://www.britannica.com/science/inbreeding

[2] https://www.britannica.com/science/assortative-mating 

[3] https://www.instituteofcaninebiology.org/blog/the-costs-and-benefits-of-inbreeding

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Neutral vs. Natural Selection

Module 7 - Molecular Evolution  Neutral Selection vs. Natural Selection Kimura argued that random "genetic drift" instead of natural selection is the main cause of evolution at the molecular level this is known as the theory of neutral evolution. Although initially, this theory was dependent on the cost of natural selection, it was later emphasized on the molecular clock which is the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. The neutral theory also demonstrated the inverse relationship between the importance of a protein and its rate of evolution. Therefore, important proteins are more constrained and changes in their amino acids less likely to be neutral.  Neutral drift is when non-synonymous and synonymous mutations are equal.  Years later around the 1990s, DNA sequence data had increased leading to a comparison of patterns of substitutions. Nonsynonymous mutations are selectively important while synonymous mutation sites are selectively unimportant. [1] Can you gue...

Part 11: The year of COVID-19

Module 11: Speciation // Alternative Blog Post           This year, I have had the honor of doing several things. I was accepted into the UMKC STAHR program in 2020, fortunately, it was not canceled. The program was virtual so by the time school started I was very familiar with zoom! Then, I become a year-long UMKC STHAR Ambassador. The program provided professional development and medical education. At K-State, I am a Class 2020 Snyder Fellow. This program helped gain professional development with a huge emphasis on leadership. I learned the importance of community and how it helps EVERYONE be successful. I was able to apply this knowledge in a couple of ways. First, I worked with leadership at K-State to assess the sense of community felt among minority pre-health (pre-med, pre-pa, pre-nursing. etc) students in both their pre-health club and advising. Second, I became part of the Intercultural Leadership Council, a joint council between the Department of ...

Part 10: Sexual Dimorphism in Female Pipefish

 Module 10: Sexual Selection  How is it possible for female pipefish ( Microphis deocata ) to court a male pipefish when is often the opposite? Figure 1: Female pipefish ( Microphis deocata ) [1] In class we learned that sexual selection explains sex differences so this evolutionary force must act differently in each sex. Often males tend to court a female because typically females are able to be choosy when selecting their mates. My hypothesis:   Sexual Dimorphism in female pipefish demonstrates that low variation in fitness and weak sexual selection is found in males leading to female pipefish to compete by advertising for mates as they now get chosen due to intersexual selection.  In the family of Syngnathidae, including pipefishes, have male pregnancy. This predisposes males to limit female reproductive success leading sexual selection to act more strongly on females with leads to female-female competition and male choice (reversed sex role) in pipefish...