Skip to main content

Before Darwin came Larmarckism

Lamarck realized that life was not fixed due to his fascination with the fossil record. Lamarck argued that when environments changed, organisms had to change their behavior to survive. This is true as organisms tend to evolve due to environmental changes and other factors. However, in the mechanism in while organisms evolved he was incorrect. He believed that evolutionary change seemed from use and disuse. 

Lamarck suggested that if a giraffe stretched its neck for leaves, the nervous fluid would flow into its neck and make it longer and this ability to have longer necks will be passed down through generations. 

[1]
Compared to Lamarck's theory of acquired variation, Darwin proposed the idea of inherited variation. Some giraffes would evolve to have longer necks, not by their neck fluid but through microevolution. These individuals would have an evolutionary advantage because they could feed on taller trees allowing them to have higher fitness thus yielding more giraffes with longer necks. 

 [1]
Lamarck also argued that life had begun through spontaneous generation. Spontaneous generation is the production of living organisms from nonliving matter which infers that life appears in sterile environments. 

Two experiments that disproved the experiments of spontaneous generation were Francesco Redi 1668 experiment and Lois Pasteur 1859 experiment. [2]
 [2]
In 1839, Schwann developed the beginning of Cell Theory: (1) All organisms are composed of one or more cells & (2) The cell is the basic unit of life in all living things. In 1858, Virchow added to Cell Theory, (3) all cells come from existing cells. It was then when Pasteur conducted the swan-neck flask experiment. 
 [3]
The timeline above provides information about disproving spontaneous generations and proving germ-theory. [3]

Sources: 

[1]http://www.zo.utexas.edu/faculty/sjasper/images/f17.1.jpg

[2] https://www.britannica.com/science/spontaneous-generation

[3] https://courses.lumenlearning.com/microbiology/chapter/foundations-of-modern-cell-theory/

Comments

  1. Dylan AlbersFebruary 12, 2021 at 5:11 PM

    I really liked your post! I also gave an example of the giraffes! That is probably one of the biggest things that he got wrong in his hypothesis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. CristinaFebruary 12, 2021 at 8:23 PM

    Hi Carmen, your blog post was great. I loved how you broke down why he was so wrong about giraffes, and when you added in the cell theory and Pasteur's experiment. Those are all fantastic examples and this was well written. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. LibbyFebruary 13, 2021 at 10:49 PM

    Awesome use of examples for disproving spontaneous generation!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction

     My name is Carmen Del Real, I am from the Old Wild West (Dodge City, Kansas).  Although I'm a Kansan, I've lived in California and often travel to Mexico. My friends and I on Highway 50, when we went Pokemon hunting.       I am passionate about education and healthcare. I currently work as a Certified Surgical Technologist and volunteer at the Flint Hills Community Center as a Medical Interpreter.       What fascinates me about biology is definitely physiology! I learned to really appreciate evolution. I often think about how the tools that we use and how the food that we consume affects humans and if our bodies will eventually be able to adapt. For example, highly processed food is known to be a contributor to diseases such as diabetes. Will our bodies adapt to did or is this something that can eliminate the humans or shall I say Homo sapiens.   During this semester, hope to learn how evolution is currently changing ...
3 comments
Read more

Part 10: Sexual Dimorphism in Female Pipefish

 Module 10: Sexual Selection  How is it possible for female pipefish ( Microphis deocata ) to court a male pipefish when is often the opposite? Figure 1: Female pipefish ( Microphis deocata ) [1] In class we learned that sexual selection explains sex differences so this evolutionary force must act differently in each sex. Often males tend to court a female because typically females are able to be choosy when selecting their mates. My hypothesis:   Sexual Dimorphism in female pipefish demonstrates that low variation in fitness and weak sexual selection is found in males leading to female pipefish to compete by advertising for mates as they now get chosen due to intersexual selection.  In the family of Syngnathidae, including pipefishes, have male pregnancy. This predisposes males to limit female reproductive success leading sexual selection to act more strongly on females with leads to female-female competition and male choice (reversed sex role) in pipefish...
Post a Comment
Read more

Part 6.2: Inbreeding

Module 6: Evolutionary Mechanisms II - Mutation, Genetic Drift, Migration, and Non-Random Mating What is inbreeding? The mating of organisms or individuals that are closely related through common ancestry is inbreeding. Homozygosity is increased when inbreeding which means the frequency of AA will increase which will eventually become fixed for the A gene. The greater the degree of homozygosity the more uniform the offspring will be. [3]  What are the benefits of inbreeding that may lead to the evolution of assortative mating? Advantages of inbreeding include increased uniformity and prepotency (ability to pass on traits to offspring), and desired traits and breeding types can be fixed. Homozygosity is increased when inbreeding which means the frequency of AA will increase which will eventually become fixed for the A gene. The greater the degree of homozygosity the more uniform the offspring will be. [3] This may have lead to assortative mating in which pair bonds are formed on the...
Post a Comment
Read more